|
As a society, we feel particularly concerned about the use of personal data. The future treatment of these is more sophisticated than the scenario that privacy experts have traditionally been managing. As pointed out by the european regulation it is necessary to provide for the existence of non-personal data inextricably linked to personal data. Furthermore, analytical tools are capable of generating new data from primary sources. Not only the nature of the personal data, but also its treatment acquires a significant structural complexity. This affects first of all the purpose. To the primary uses is added an enormous range of secondary possibilities. On the other hand, the complexity of information systems grows during the treatment life cycle. Thus, the sources of data origin whose collection integrates the internet of objects, or individual, domestic, urban and environmental sensors, among others, multiply.
Secondly, the treatment requires the construction of Italy Telegram Number Data epositories capable of offering data quality, high processing possibilities, and the integration of additional tools such as apis or artificial intelligence that allow the generation of value. This scenario is not a privilege of states and large companies, through new value generation models it can be at the service of smes, researchers and entrepreneurs. Therefore, the data ecosystem we are heading towards requires high capacities and new approaches from the privacy sector. The future announced by european digital strategy, the european data spaces, and the instrumental rules for their governance that are being developed, draw a scenario that goes beyond linearity and the primary focus of some analyses. In its classical conception, the right to data protection as control over personal information and limitation of its use has admitted approaches as basic as manichaean.
The new european data protection model is based on a risk-focused approach that is necessarily accompanied by the technique of data protection by design and by default aimed at achieving technology development capable of being harmonized with the guarantee of fundamental rights. And this must be the effort to which we privacy experts must dedicate ourselves as a priority in the coming years. We are presented with a highly complex horizon that requires the best of our abilities to overcome binary responses. A “yes” or a “no” is not expected of us. In the presence of treatments that are manifestly illicit and contrary to the most basic respect for human dignity, we must offer a radically negative response.
|
|